DOL Issues Technical Amendment Reinstating 2019 FLSA Overtime Regulations

DOL Restores Pre-2024 FLSA Overtime Exemptions: $684/Week Salary Threshold Now in Effect

On Thursday, May 14, the U.S. Department of Labor (DOL) issued a technical amendment formally restoring the pre-2024 regulatory text governing overtime exemptions under the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA), implementing federal court orders that had already vacated the Biden-era salary threshold rule. For employers across the country, this development carries immediate and practical implications. […]

DOL Restores Pre-2024 FLSA Overtime Exemptions: $684/Week Salary Threshold Now in Effect Read More »

AI Hiring Tools: New State Laws, Federal Risks & Compliance Strategies for Employers

AI Hiring Tools: New State Laws, Federal Risks & Compliance Strategies for Employers

Employers are increasingly integrating artificial intelligence (AI) into the hiring process, deploying AI hiring tools across multiple stages of the employment funnel, including to manage application volume. Common AI hiring tools include: (1) passive recruiting technology to identify qualified candidates and invite them to apply to open positions; (2) resume scanners to rank or otherwise

AI Hiring Tools: New State Laws, Federal Risks & Compliance Strategies for Employers Read More »

Bloomington Eliminates Local ESST Ordinance as State Law Takes Precedence

Bloomington Repeals ESST Ordinance: What Minnesota Employers Need to Know

On April 27, 2026, Bloomington, Minnesota repealed its Earned Sick and Safe Time Ordinance. As explained in the corresponding meeting agenda packet, “the primary purpose of Bloomington’s ESST ordinance, to guarantee paid sick and safe time, has been fulfilled by the statewide law.” Bloomington is the second Minnesota city to repeal its paid sick and safe leave ordinance

Bloomington Repeals ESST Ordinance: What Minnesota Employers Need to Know Read More »

Employer Liability for Third-Party Harassment Under Federal and State Law

Employer Liability for Third-Party Harassment Under Federal and State Law

Third-party harassment occurs when an employee faces discrimination or a hostile work environment caused by non-employees like clients or vendors. Employers have a legal duty of care to protect staff from such conduct under federal and most state laws.  Discover how to identify signs of harassment and the strategic steps employees should take to protect

Employer Liability for Third-Party Harassment Under Federal and State Law Read More »

Menopause at Work: When Accommodation Expectations Become Explicit Law

Menopause at Work: When Accommodation Expectations Become Explicit Law

Historically, menopause has not been specifically identified as a protected medical condition under state and federal law, even though its related symptoms in many cases are medical conditions covered by existing leave and accommodation laws. That is rapidly changing. In 2025, Rhode Island became the first state to expressly require workplace accommodations for employees experiencing menopause

Menopause at Work: When Accommodation Expectations Become Explicit Law Read More »

Beyond Policy: Why Ongoing Workplace Behavior Training Matters

Beyond Policy: Why Ongoing Workplace Behavior Training Matters

Responsible employers have long known that having comprehensive workplace behavior policies are essential but not nearly enough. Even organizations with well‑established policies can find themselves exposed if they can’t demonstrate that they are continually reinforcing standards, assessing risks, and equipping workers to identify and prevent harmful conduct. Employers are facing an increasingly complex compliance landscape

Beyond Policy: Why Ongoing Workplace Behavior Training Matters Read More »

Drafting Lawful Performance Improvement Plans After Muldrow and Walsh

Drafting Lawful Performance Improvement Plans After Muldrow and Walsh

Establishing a claim of unlawful discrimination or retaliation in the workplace requires, among other elements, that an employee show they experienced an “adverse employment action.” Since Muldrow v. City of St. Louis, 601 U.S. 346 (2024), where the U.S. Supreme Court held that an employee need not show “significant” harm, but only “some harm,” to establish an

Drafting Lawful Performance Improvement Plans After Muldrow and Walsh Read More »

Navigating Political Expression in the Workplace: Legal Risks and Best Practices

Navigating Political Expression in the Workplace: Legal Risks and Best Practices

This past year employers in the United States have seen an increase in workplace political discourse as they try to balance offering freedom of expression, avoiding workplace division, and complying with state and federal laws. This guide highlights the laws that could be implicated with workplace political speech, and offers tips on minimizing liability. Laws

Navigating Political Expression in the Workplace: Legal Risks and Best Practices Read More »

DOL's 2026 Proposed Rule: Easier Independent Contractor Classifications with Core Focus on Control and Profit/Loss

DOL’s 2026 Proposed Rule: Easier Independent Contractor Classifications with Core Focus on Control and Profit/Loss

The U.S. Department of Labor (DOL) has proposed another revision to independent contractor regulations, one that would provide for more leeway in classifying workers as contractors. DOL’s proposed rule, published on February 26, 2026, would rescind the Biden DOL’s March 2024 independent contractor regulation and reinstate a framework substantially tracking the prior Trump rule of

DOL’s 2026 Proposed Rule: Easier Independent Contractor Classifications with Core Focus on Control and Profit/Loss Read More »